![]() | ![]() |
|
Welcome to the Cobra Club Forums forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
| |||||||
| Home | Forums | Blogs | Videos Gallery | Cobra Marques | Info | Groups | Classifieds | Gallery | Arcade | Shopping |
| Wiki | Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| Sponsored Links | ||
| ||
| |
| ||||
| Hi Garry, As far as I'm aware the rear lights do not need to be "E" marked, as long as they meet the radius requirements, position, and are bright enough they should be acceptable.
__________________ Cheers, Clive (If I'm not here, I'm either in the workshop or on the golf course!) |
| |||
| My rear indicators lights are E marked but ot eh rear side brake light and they passed the SVA. I mounted the indicators at the top with the E mark facing up so it was easy to see. It worked for me Ian |
| ||||
| Quote:
on each lens. Only if they are a combined cluster is it ok to have a single E mark or equivalent. It is then up to the applicant to prove, if requested, that the equivalent mark complies with UK standards. Having just reread the section in the SVA manual detailing reasons for failure I noted that nowhere does it state that not having an E mark or equivalent is a cause to fail ? It only states, quote - " except in the case of a headlamp,not of a similar brightness when compared with a lamp bearing an appropriate approval mark as given in annex 1" end quote. So I read that as long as the lamp brightness can be compared to a similar E marked lamp the actual lamp doesn't need an E mark ???? Can any one enlighten (pardon the pun) us.
__________________ Chris Lutman - Daytona Coupe |
| ||||
| SVA Notes, Section 9.1 Note 3 states:- "The brightness of lamps bearing an appropriate approval mark, as given in Annex 1, defines the acceptable standard. Lamps not bearing such a mark should emit light of similar brightness." From this I gather that as long as the lamp is as bright as one with the approved mark, it is acceptable. The approval mark E or e Identity symbol or BS marks are:- Rear position lamp - "R" Stop Lamp - "S1" or "S2"
__________________ Cheers, Clive (If I'm not here, I'm either in the workshop or on the golf course!) |
| ||||
| You don't need an "E" mark as long as they are the right colour, intensity and radius. I fitted the 488 style ones, which don’t have an “E” mark on them and they passed OK, and in November last year a friend of mine had the same result at a different centre.
__________________ East Midlands Area Rep Mega Squirt in and running ! Car Sprayed and looking Fab |
| Sponsored Links | ||
| ||
| |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Jag rear brake upgrade | richardd | General Tech Tips & Questions | 5 | 13-04-08 11:23 PM |
| Bolts needed & warning lamps | Spanish Dave | General Cobra Discussion | 6 | 28-10-07 10:56 PM |
| Brighter rear lamps | nbracken | General Tech Tips & Questions | 17 | 30-10-05 08:35 AM |
| Rear Fog Lamps & GB Badges | V8 BJC | General Cobra Discussion | 2 | 13-11-04 04:49 PM |
| rear near side wheel spacing | perky | Pilgrim Sumo Technical Questions | 3 | 25-04-04 05:49 AM |